If there is any topic in all of trading – short term or otherwise – that generates more controversy as to how it should be done, than setting stop loss values, I do not know what it could be.
Ask a dozen traders how they do it and you may get a dozen different answers. Many simply set stop loss at the maximum what they are willing to risk on a given trade. My system may not be perfect, but I assure you it is better than that.
The amount of risk – the initial stop loss value – for a trade must be known BEFORE entering the trade. It is an essential element in determining whether the trade meets the minimum requirements for a trade – which in our case is a profit potential that is at least twice the risk. So my system must have an accurate and reliable way of quickly determining the initial stop loss value.
That is where my support and resistant values (SRVs) become invaluable. I cannot tell you everything required setting a stop loss correctly in this short blog posting, but I can tell you generally what is involved.
First, each type of trade we do – there are several – has a “visual setup” associated with it. That visual setup almost always includes a SRV – and that SRV has a specific price value. The visual pattern on which our trade is based can be broken by price movement against our position – usually just a few ticks from the SRV on which our entry is based.
For example, if the oscillation we expect to trade is projected to hit an SRV and bounce in the opposite direction, we will try to enter the trade about one tick from that SRV – often employing the “market if touched” order entry. Obviously a move beyond that SRV of very few ticks would invalidate our logic of entry, so our stop loss can be about three ticks beyond that SRV value. Entry price of one tick away from the SRV and a stop loss 3 ticks away in the opposite direction means our stop loss is 4 ticks.
With risk at 4 ticks we need a potential oscillation of at least 8 ticks for a minimum trade.
All of this can be visually calculated almost instantly with our method of trading.
The savvy trader knows that there will be some losing trades – but by carefully limiting the amount of loss when the trade goes bad, eventual profit can be achieved by picking only those trades with a high degree of probability of success.
Without our SRVs setting stop losses would be much harder and riskier to determine – probably resulting in greater loss on each losing trade.
Perhaps learning to create and trade off SRVs could improve your short term trading performance. Learn about SRVs in our eBook, See the Music of the Market.
Exchange rates table is provided by DailyForex.com - Forex Reviews and News
Live currency cross rates is provided by DailyForex.com - Forex Reviews and News
Live indices widget is provided by DailyForex.com - Forex Reviews and News
Live commodities widget is provided by DailyForex.com - Forex Reviews and News
Author & Trader
Great system – couldn’t trade without it !!Frank YDavid, Panama
I trade the US Bond Markets exclusively – amazed at the accuracy of the SRV’s !!George SNew York, NY
….very impressed with the whole philosophy – both personal and trading, expressed in the book. I will read and revert !!Richard DUSA
Thanks for the method !! Very solid, very logical entry and exit and genius SRV’s !!Denis DRussia
“The SRV’s are amazingly accurate”.Tony Texas
the SRV’s are spot on !!Tom CUSA
- January 2017 (1)
- December 2016 (3)
- September 2016 (2)
- August 2016 (2)
- July 2016 (2)
- June 2016 (5)
- May 2016 (1)
- April 2016 (2)
- March 2016 (1)
- February 2016 (3)
- January 2016 (3)
- December 2015 (1)
- November 2015 (3)
- October 2015 (5)
- September 2015 (5)
- August 2015 (2)
- July 2015 (5)
- May 2015 (1)
- April 2015 (1)
- March 2015 (1)
- January 2015 (1)
- November 2014 (1)
- October 2014 (1)
- August 2014 (1)
- July 2014 (6)
- June 2014 (3)
- May 2014 (5)
- April 2014 (2)
- March 2014 (2)
- February 2014 (2)
- January 2014 (10)
- December 2013 (11)
- November 2013 (20)
- October 2013 (13)
- September 2013 (14)
- August 2013 (10)
- July 2013 (26)
- June 2013 (16)